It’s hostile to the preferences of developers who have emotional attachment to particular nonweb (or just emotional hostility to web) technology, who are left in the dust, in terms of meeting users actual needs, by those adopting Electron.
Slack for mac os x software#
Given that users generally have a preference to have software with the functionality they desire developed and maintained, this is conducive, rather than hostile, to user preferences. But this is in no way user hostile: it means the cost to develop software with any given function is lower in developer hours (and, for commercial entities paying for development, actual $$), which means it is more likely to get done than otherwise, and that it is more likely to be a sustainable proposition to maintain on an ongoing basis.
Slack for mac os x code#
Sure, the case for Electron is that it allows leveraging web-targeting code and skills, which makes more devs able to work on desktop software give the current prevalence of web skills and makes their job easier given the prevalence of web-targeting code that can be reused. > Electron is great if you're a developer who wants to write apps in javascript+HTML+CSS and put developer preferences over preferences of users
It could, but people used Swing in practice. If personal computing survives the next few decades, future historians will judge us very poorly. Now we live in an age where developers loudly proclaim their love for bundling an entire web browser as their UI, nothing even remotely resembles the native look-n-feel, and they consider adding a bespoke 'Dark Mode' theme some kind of actually noteworthy achievement. People used to say one of the reasons Java was shit because it didn't use native widgets and looked out of place, but now that's the default even for native software. People used to say one of the reasons Linux Desktop was shit was that it had so many different look-n-feel's for its disparate applications. Sadly, that all went away (about the time the iPhone was released?) and we entered a UX dark age where users only ever get at most 2 choices about theming and UI is considered part of your brand. In the 90s and early 00s it was a sign of professionalism that applications used native OS widgets and respected the theming choices of the user. Web tech is cool for what it is within the scope of a webbrowser, but outside of that it is a steaming pile of. Yes, they lag and are slow on all OS's and yes we can notice it.
Nevermind the resource usage and general laggy UI from these application. Basically they stick out like a fat wart. They ignore basic guidelines, spacing is all different, different themes, no native window dressing/menu's, most don't use the tray/notification system correctly etc. They do not conform to the rest of the system.
Slack for mac os x install#
Problem is, the moment I install any electron/web-based app (Slack, VS Code, Gitkraken, Spotify, Steam etc), they look out of place. They use a tiny amount of disk space and a tiny memory footprint while running. Point is, the whole experience is very consistent. Most of them also uses the same keyboard shortcut system and accessibility features. The same buttons, same spacing, same font sizes/types, same colours, same systems shell/window decorations, scroll bars etc. The majority of the applications uses the operating system's theming system, which makes all applications look the same. Given no other alternatives to do X, what is preferable? An Electron app that allows people to do X, or no app at all?Įxample: On Fedora, I'd install the Arc Theme + some fancy icon pack. Here's a hypotetical/philosophical question for the community in general. But I feel that this policing of how people write their own software (especially when it's something purely done as a hobby and/or just to share something with people) is getting somewhat out of hand. That's not to say that Electron doesn't have all these issues, of course. And Electron lets me use the knowledge I already have to make things. HTML/CSS/Javascript is all I know and it's probably all I will reasonably stay with for a while because of various circumstances. But every time an electron app gets promoted somewhere (HN/Reddit/Twitter/wherever) there is always _someone_ yelling at the developer because they decided to use Electron.Īs a javascript developer, I'm sorry that I don't have the patience/smarts/skills/time to learn C++/Qt/GTK/WxWidgets/etc. More people making software is good! And the community grows because of it, and everything is better. I thought the community in general was in favour of allowing people to create whatever they wanted, however they wanted. This intense hatred for Electron has always baffled me.
0 kommentar(er)
